Compliance & audit software
Evidence lives in six systems and an audit deadline is always close.
The software problem this industry has
Someone screenshots a settings page, drops it in a folder, and it's stale by the next cycle — but nobody finds that out until an auditor asks. So every audit becomes a re-gathering exercise, and proving compliance ends up costing more than the compliance itself.
The work isn't hard. It's just done from scratch every time.
Why generic tools fail it
Document tools store files. They don't know what a control is, which piece of evidence satisfies it, when that evidence went stale, or whose job it is to refresh it.
That's a data model, not a drive. Bolt a compliance process onto a folder structure and what you have is a folder structure with a deadline attached.
Where it hurts
- Evidence is gathered by screenshot and filed in folders nobody can search.
- Findings are typed into a Word template after the audit, not during it.
- Non-conformances get raised, then lost between cycles.
- Every audit starts from a blank checklist.
What we'd build first
- A control-and-evidence data model, not a folder structure
- Capture on site, on a phone, tagged to the clause it proves
- Reports and notices generated from the record, not retyped
- Owners and reminders on anything that goes stale
What we've built here
One of our builds is an ISO 9001 audit platform: an auditor picks the standard and the sector, runs the audit on a phone on site, and exports the finished report and the non-conformance notice. We've also built a reminder platform that sends daily email reminders to corporate legal officers — start to live in one week, our fastest launch.
We build the software. We don't issue certifications and we won't claim standards we can't evidence: audit trails, access control, data retention, evidence workflows and the integrations that keep them current. Bring the framework and we'll build to it.